Comments on: Status http://raphael.doxos.com/2007/04/14/status/ Some place between 40 and Death Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:53:35 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: Huw http://raphael.doxos.com/2007/04/14/status/#comment-219 Huw Sat, 14 Apr 2007 14:58:52 +0000 http://raphael.doxos.com/2007/04/14/status/#comment-219 Very wise and much appreciated. But... perhaps for the same reasons, I didn't see our wonderful conversation as "blog-alogue" so much as "blogable". Very wise and much appreciated. But… perhaps for the same reasons, I didn’t see our wonderful conversation as “blog-alogue” so much as “blogable”.

]]> By: peter http://raphael.doxos.com/2007/04/14/status/#comment-215 peter Sat, 14 Apr 2007 13:07:26 +0000 http://raphael.doxos.com/2007/04/14/status/#comment-215 Ah, gotcha. One of the reasons I didn't comment on the blog entries (much, if at all - I'm not sure) is that there are certain topics I'd rather not discuss unless I can get immediate feedback. IM is an improvement over exchanging comments because you have the opportunity to correct my mis-reading right away. Ah, gotcha. One of the reasons I didn’t comment on the blog entries (much, if at all - I’m not sure) is that there are certain topics I’d rather not discuss unless I can get immediate feedback. IM is an improvement over exchanging comments because you have the opportunity to correct my mis-reading right away.

]]> By: Huw http://raphael.doxos.com/2007/04/14/status/#comment-209 Huw Sat, 14 Apr 2007 12:41:36 +0000 http://raphael.doxos.com/2007/04/14/status/#comment-209 Hehehe. How about "nothing like our usual 15+ comments". Apart from your awesome chat with me... that was good. I did try to ask specific questions... specifically of Larry and Fr Ernesto. (Larry's stil got an open question related to "tradition" = "God" which I think would be an awesome conversation.) Can equally be my own failure. But I figured now that all the writing is done, maybe more can be said. Hehehe. How about “nothing like our usual 15+ comments”.

Apart from your awesome chat with me… that was good.

I did try to ask specific questions… specifically of Larry and Fr Ernesto. (Larry’s stil got an open question related to “tradition” = “God” which I think would be an awesome conversation.)

Can equally be my own failure. But I figured now that all the writing is done, maybe more can be said.

]]> By: peter http://raphael.doxos.com/2007/04/14/status/#comment-208 peter Sat, 14 Apr 2007 12:30:39 +0000 http://raphael.doxos.com/2007/04/14/status/#comment-208 <a href="http://raphael.doxos.com/2007/03/25/full-disclosure/" rel="nofollow">No real dialogue</a>? No real dialogue?

]]> By: Huw http://raphael.doxos.com/2007/04/14/status/#comment-205 Huw Sat, 14 Apr 2007 07:40:38 +0000 http://raphael.doxos.com/2007/04/14/status/#comment-205 Joe - thanks. I read your posts with great interest. It's sometimes a little to heavy for me, but yes: I feel your love coming through. Joe - thanks. I read your posts with great interest. It’s sometimes a little to heavy for me, but yes: I feel your love coming through.

]]> By: joe perez http://raphael.doxos.com/2007/04/14/status/#comment-204 joe perez Sat, 14 Apr 2007 07:36:54 +0000 http://raphael.doxos.com/2007/04/14/status/#comment-204 Great post. I like the part about falling in love with Jesus/God. Hope you see my book for my own personal experience with falling in love with Jesus/God. All the best, Joe Great post. I like the part about falling in love with Jesus/God. Hope you see my book for my own personal experience with falling in love with Jesus/God. All the best, Joe

]]>