<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A point of agreement&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://raphael.doxos.com/2007/04/28/a-point-of-agreement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://raphael.doxos.com/2007/04/28/a-point-of-agreement/</link>
	<description>Some place between 40 and Death</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Huw</title>
		<link>http://raphael.doxos.com/2007/04/28/a-point-of-agreement/#comment-390</link>
		<dc:creator>Huw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 01:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raphael.doxos.com/2007/04/28/a-point-of-agreement/#comment-390</guid>
		<description>I was kinda amused at "reasserter".  I was equally amused by "traditionalist" and "innovationist" in the 90s.  I think Progressive works, although the opposite isn't so much regressive as it is stick-in-the-mud.  The problem, of course, with the use of synergetic binomialism is that one always sounds "bad" to the speaker (depending on her POV).  None of them have the same sort of neutral qualities as "Ying/Yang".

I liked the one comment over there where the guy says "reasserter = Christian" in a way that totally disenfranchises  everyone who might disagree with him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was kinda amused at &#8220;reasserter&#8221;.  I was equally amused by &#8220;traditionalist&#8221; and &#8220;innovationist&#8221; in the 90s.  I think Progressive works, although the opposite isn&#8217;t so much regressive as it is stick-in-the-mud.  The problem, of course, with the use of synergetic binomialism is that one always sounds &#8220;bad&#8221; to the speaker (depending on her POV).  None of them have the same sort of neutral qualities as &#8220;Ying/Yang&#8221;.</p>
<p>I liked the one comment over there where the guy says &#8220;reasserter = Christian&#8221; in a way that totally disenfranchises  everyone who might disagree with him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fr. Ernesto</title>
		<link>http://raphael.doxos.com/2007/04/28/a-point-of-agreement/#comment-387</link>
		<dc:creator>Fr. Ernesto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 15:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raphael.doxos.com/2007/04/28/a-point-of-agreement/#comment-387</guid>
		<description>Sorry, forgot to say that Republicans have been quite successful in making "liberal" into a word on the same level as "fundamentalist."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, forgot to say that Republicans have been quite successful in making &#8220;liberal&#8221; into a word on the same level as &#8220;fundamentalist.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fr. Ernesto</title>
		<link>http://raphael.doxos.com/2007/04/28/a-point-of-agreement/#comment-386</link>
		<dc:creator>Fr. Ernesto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 15:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raphael.doxos.com/2007/04/28/a-point-of-agreement/#comment-386</guid>
		<description>Hmm,

I had not read of the term "reasserter" before. But I can see why it became necessary to come up with new terminology, as the words "conservative" or "traditionalist" or "biblical" had become much too loaded with inaccurate connotations to allow for their continued use. In passing, "fundamentalist" as a term (though I do use it) is really almost gone as a word for anything other than having a perjorative bad feeling about someone. I probably need to not use it anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm,</p>
<p>I had not read of the term &#8220;reasserter&#8221; before. But I can see why it became necessary to come up with new terminology, as the words &#8220;conservative&#8221; or &#8220;traditionalist&#8221; or &#8220;biblical&#8221; had become much too loaded with inaccurate connotations to allow for their continued use. In passing, &#8220;fundamentalist&#8221; as a term (though I do use it) is really almost gone as a word for anything other than having a perjorative bad feeling about someone. I probably need to not use it anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
