Comments on: With No Temple http://raphael.doxos.com/2007/05/13/with-no-temple/ We are Flesh-and-Spirit on a journey to Integral Unity with God. Thu, 08 Jan 2009 11:24:33 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Huw http://raphael.doxos.com/2007/05/13/with-no-temple/comment-page-1/#comment-462 Huw Mon, 14 May 2007 15:32:35 +0000 http://raphael.doxos.com/2007/05/13/with-no-temple/#comment-462 Padre - I hear you about the Now Not Yet. This was a big thing at SGN, in fact. Is it possible the "not yet" might include some of the mistakes Christians have done? "Thy Kingdom Come..." OOOPS! We didn't mean to do *THAT*! Take 47, let's try it again, with feeling. Padre -

I hear you about the Now Not Yet. This was a big thing at SGN, in fact.

Is it possible the “not yet” might include some of the mistakes Christians have done? “Thy Kingdom Come…” OOOPS! We didn’t mean to do *THAT*! Take 47, let’s try it again, with feeling.

]]> By: Rob+ http://raphael.doxos.com/2007/05/13/with-no-temple/comment-page-1/#comment-454 Rob+ Mon, 14 May 2007 00:34:04 +0000 http://raphael.doxos.com/2007/05/13/with-no-temple/#comment-454 2 quick remarks 1) I'm still all about the here/not yet quality of the Kingdom 2) Doesn't all Scripture critque the Church? Does not the Spirit continue to inculcate the virtues of the Christian life throught the words of Scripture? Can't we still hear the prophetic words of the Gospel calling us to a deeper pursuit of holiness and union with God? 2 quick remarks
1) I’m still all about the here/not yet quality of the Kingdom

2) Doesn’t all Scripture critque the Church? Does not the Spirit continue to inculcate the virtues of the Christian life throught the words of Scripture? Can’t we still hear the prophetic words of the Gospel calling us to a deeper pursuit of holiness and union with God?

]]> By: Huw http://raphael.doxos.com/2007/05/13/with-no-temple/comment-page-1/#comment-451 Huw Sun, 13 May 2007 20:23:41 +0000 http://raphael.doxos.com/2007/05/13/with-no-temple/#comment-451 in the canon--- or read liturgically. in the canon— or read liturgically.

]]> By: peter http://raphael.doxos.com/2007/05/13/with-no-temple/comment-page-1/#comment-450 peter Sun, 13 May 2007 20:18:14 +0000 http://raphael.doxos.com/2007/05/13/with-no-temple/#comment-450 <i>Of course, that’s silly.</i> Yup. The fact that it was accepted into the canon by the (so-called) Constantinian church well after the lectionary had settled out seems like a good enough explanation to me. Occam's Razor, don't you know? Of course, that’s silly.

Yup. The fact that it was accepted into the canon by the (so-called) Constantinian church well after the lectionary had settled out seems like a good enough explanation to me. Occam’s Razor, don’t you know?

]]>