<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: tmatt Trio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://raphael.doxos.com/2007/07/18/tmatt-trio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://raphael.doxos.com/2007/07/18/tmatt-trio/</link>
	<description>We are Flesh-and-Spirit on a journey to Integral Unity with God.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 16:24:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Huw</title>
		<link>http://raphael.doxos.com/2007/07/18/tmatt-trio/comment-page-1/#comment-879</link>
		<dc:creator>Huw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 06:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raphael.doxos.com/2007/07/18/tmatt-trio/#comment-879</guid>
		<description>I think I answered yes, yes and yes  

(I just realised my second was unclear.. that &#039;universalism&#039; is all because of Jesus.)

I wonder if tmatt intended for these questions to be answered by people who live outside the USA?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I answered yes, yes and yes  </p>
<p>(I just realised my second was unclear.. that &#8216;universalism&#8217; is all because of Jesus.)</p>
<p>I wonder if tmatt intended for these questions to be answered by people who live outside the USA?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Hayes</title>
		<link>http://raphael.doxos.com/2007/07/18/tmatt-trio/comment-page-1/#comment-878</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Hayes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 06:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raphael.doxos.com/2007/07/18/tmatt-trio/#comment-878</guid>
		<description>Given the reservations you make, I&#039;d still answer yes, yes and yes.

Since I am a certified member of the Religiousb Left, I assume those answers pertain to ther Left, and No answers pertain to the Right, though Mattingly fails to make that point clear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the reservations you make, I&#8217;d still answer yes, yes and yes.</p>
<p>Since I am a certified member of the Religiousb Left, I assume those answers pertain to ther Left, and No answers pertain to the Right, though Mattingly fails to make that point clear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The young fogey</title>
		<link>http://raphael.doxos.com/2007/07/18/tmatt-trio/comment-page-1/#comment-871</link>
		<dc:creator>The young fogey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 14:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raphael.doxos.com/2007/07/18/tmatt-trio/#comment-871</guid>
		<description>1. By faith, yes and yes.

2. Yes but not &lt;i&gt;extra ecclesiam nulla salus&lt;/i&gt; in Fr Leonard Feeney&#039;s sense (&#039;all non-___s are going to hell&#039;, an arrogant position). And yes, both explicitly and implicitly: &#039;I have other sheep not of this fold&#039; or chances are there are non- including never-Christian people in heaven.

3. Yes, defining sex and marriage as they have long commonly been understood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. By faith, yes and yes.</p>
<p>2. Yes but not <i>extra ecclesiam nulla salus</i> in Fr Leonard Feeney&#8217;s sense (&#8216;all non-___s are going to hell&#8217;, an arrogant position). And yes, both explicitly and implicitly: &#8216;I have other sheep not of this fold&#8217; or chances are there are non- including never-Christian people in heaven.</p>
<p>3. Yes, defining sex and marriage as they have long commonly been understood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
