<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Exes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://raphael.doxos.com/2008/02/28/the-exes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://raphael.doxos.com/2008/02/28/the-exes/</link>
	<description>We are Flesh-and-Spirit on a journey to Integral Unity with God.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 16:24:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Huw</title>
		<link>http://raphael.doxos.com/2008/02/28/the-exes/comment-page-1/#comment-2312</link>
		<dc:creator>Huw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raphael.doxos.com/2008/02/28/the-exes/#comment-2312</guid>
		<description>I agree, but I also think it&#039;s a little deeper: the exgay thing adds a layer that is, really, *in support* of gay rights.  Ex-gay doesn&#039;t equal &quot;ex-sinner&quot; in this world view: the idea of Ex-gay therapy is that there is something wrong - beyond just the activity.

I say this is in support of gay rights because Gay Rights activists do not just believe that &quot;gay&quot; is a &quot;choice&quot; for a specific behaviour.  

You are right that, by (o)rthodox Christian standards, the idea of &quot;fixing&quot; a sinner is totally off.  But there is an implication in the idea of therapy that goes beyond simply fixing the behaviour.  That&#039;s why I wonder why, from a culture that (largely) rejects psychological insights as suspect, this one (which you and I see as errant for different reasons) comes out again and again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, but I also think it&#8217;s a little deeper: the exgay thing adds a layer that is, really, *in support* of gay rights.  Ex-gay doesn&#8217;t equal &#8220;ex-sinner&#8221; in this world view: the idea of Ex-gay therapy is that there is something wrong &#8211; beyond just the activity.</p>
<p>I say this is in support of gay rights because Gay Rights activists do not just believe that &#8220;gay&#8221; is a &#8220;choice&#8221; for a specific behaviour.  </p>
<p>You are right that, by (o)rthodox Christian standards, the idea of &#8220;fixing&#8221; a sinner is totally off.  But there is an implication in the idea of therapy that goes beyond simply fixing the behaviour.  That&#8217;s why I wonder why, from a culture that (largely) rejects psychological insights as suspect, this one (which you and I see as errant for different reasons) comes out again and again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Jones</title>
		<link>http://raphael.doxos.com/2008/02/28/the-exes/comment-page-1/#comment-2311</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raphael.doxos.com/2008/02/28/the-exes/#comment-2311</guid>
		<description>I have never understood the &quot;ex-gay&quot; thing.  If one believes, as a traditional Christian, that homosexual behavior is sinful, then logically &quot;ex-gay&quot; means &quot;ex-sinner&quot;.

But none of us, &quot;gay&quot; or otherwise, is ever an &quot;ex-sinner&quot; (this side of the eschaton, anyway).  Redeemed, yes; &quot;ex&quot;, no.

To me the &quot;ex-gay&quot; thing means that if you&#039;re gay you have to go &quot;get fixed&quot; before you can be on the same playing-field with other Christians.  That is totally heterodox.  We all need to &quot;get fixed&quot; in exactly the same way, and you don&#039;t get fixed by going to a therapist.  You get fixed by prayer, fasting, and the means of grace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have never understood the &#8220;ex-gay&#8221; thing.  If one believes, as a traditional Christian, that homosexual behavior is sinful, then logically &#8220;ex-gay&#8221; means &#8220;ex-sinner&#8221;.</p>
<p>But none of us, &#8220;gay&#8221; or otherwise, is ever an &#8220;ex-sinner&#8221; (this side of the eschaton, anyway).  Redeemed, yes; &#8220;ex&#8221;, no.</p>
<p>To me the &#8220;ex-gay&#8221; thing means that if you&#8217;re gay you have to go &#8220;get fixed&#8221; before you can be on the same playing-field with other Christians.  That is totally heterodox.  We all need to &#8220;get fixed&#8221; in exactly the same way, and you don&#8217;t get fixed by going to a therapist.  You get fixed by prayer, fasting, and the means of grace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
