<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New Christians&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://raphael.doxos.com/2008/03/11/the-new-christians/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://raphael.doxos.com/2008/03/11/the-new-christians/</link>
	<description>We are Flesh-and-Spirit on a journey to Integral Unity with God.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 16:24:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Morrell</title>
		<link>http://raphael.doxos.com/2008/03/11/the-new-christians/comment-page-1/#comment-2379</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Morrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 04:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raphael.doxos.com/2008/03/11/the-new-christians/#comment-2379</guid>
		<description>Oops! The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.apostleschurch.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Church of the Apostles&lt;/a&gt; I&#039;m referring to is the Episcopal/ECLA/Emergent hybrid coordinated by &#039;urban abbess&#039; &lt;a href=&quot;http://submerge.typepad.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Karen Ward&lt;/a&gt; of &lt;a href=&quot;http://anglimergent.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Anglimergent&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops! The <a href="http://www.apostleschurch.org" rel="nofollow">Church of the Apostles</a> I&#8217;m referring to is the Episcopal/ECLA/Emergent hybrid coordinated by &#8216;urban abbess&#8217; <a href="http://submerge.typepad.com" rel="nofollow">Karen Ward</a> of <a href="http://anglimergent.org" rel="nofollow">Anglimergent</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Morrell</title>
		<link>http://raphael.doxos.com/2008/03/11/the-new-christians/comment-page-1/#comment-2378</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Morrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 04:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raphael.doxos.com/2008/03/11/the-new-christians/#comment-2378</guid>
		<description>Great post, and great questions. I&#039;d say two things:

1.) Many--nay--most emergents don&#039;t &#039;outright reject&#039; the distinction between clergy and laity; it&#039;s upheld, believe me. Now don&#039;t get me wrong, emergent pastors are some of the best and nicest people you&#039;ll ever meet--I say this sincerely. They&#039;re my friends. But they &#039;reimagine&#039; far more theology than church practice. Of course, I&#039;m biased--I&#039;ve been part of an intentional house church community (one or another) for the past ten years. We&#039;re quite egalitarian--more &#039;starfish&#039; than &#039;spider&#039; for sure. Of course, our downside is we reimagine church structure but don&#039;t challenge too much theology. It&#039;s too bad. 

but

2.) I really respect the Episcopal church. I love Church of the Apostles&lt;/a&gt; and Br. Karekin and Sara Miles...I think you guys have tons of potential. But I wonder if you couldn&#039;t maybe tweak your core substructures, make them more starfish-like? Y&#039;know, ecclesiology must change or die? Make liturgy once more &#039;the work of the people&#039;? I dunno, probably too late at night (on the East Coast) to be thinking such thoughts...I&#039;ll close by saying that I just started reading Wm Countryman&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/Living-Border-Holy-Renewing-Priesthood/dp/0819217735/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1206073071&amp;sr=1-1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Living on the Border of the Holy: Renewing the Priesthood of All&lt;/a&gt;. Looks promising. I hope to find a place where house church and liturgical kiss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, and great questions. I&#8217;d say two things:</p>
<p>1.) Many&#8211;nay&#8211;most emergents don&#8217;t &#8216;outright reject&#8217; the distinction between clergy and laity; it&#8217;s upheld, believe me. Now don&#8217;t get me wrong, emergent pastors are some of the best and nicest people you&#8217;ll ever meet&#8211;I say this sincerely. They&#8217;re my friends. But they &#8216;reimagine&#8217; far more theology than church practice. Of course, I&#8217;m biased&#8211;I&#8217;ve been part of an intentional house church community (one or another) for the past ten years. We&#8217;re quite egalitarian&#8211;more &#8217;starfish&#8217; than &#8217;spider&#8217; for sure. Of course, our downside is we reimagine church structure but don&#8217;t challenge too much theology. It&#8217;s too bad. </p>
<p>but</p>
<p>2.) I really respect the Episcopal church. I love Church of the Apostles and Br. Karekin and Sara Miles&#8230;I think you guys have tons of potential. But I wonder if you couldn&#8217;t maybe tweak your core substructures, make them more starfish-like? Y&#8217;know, ecclesiology must change or die? Make liturgy once more &#8216;the work of the people&#8217;? I dunno, probably too late at night (on the East Coast) to be thinking such thoughts&#8230;I&#8217;ll close by saying that I just started reading Wm Countryman&#8217;s <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Living-Border-Holy-Renewing-Priesthood/dp/0819217735/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1206073071&amp;sr=1-1" rel="nofollow">Living on the Border of the Holy: Renewing the Priesthood of All</a>. Looks promising. I hope to find a place where house church and liturgical kiss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fr. Ernesto</title>
		<link>http://raphael.doxos.com/2008/03/11/the-new-christians/comment-page-1/#comment-2349</link>
		<dc:creator>Fr. Ernesto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raphael.doxos.com/2008/03/11/the-new-christians/#comment-2349</guid>
		<description>I fear that an Emergent-style event in a mainline church would be like an old Greek mask over the reality. To go back to another generation, guitar Masses in the 1960&#039;s were all too often that same type of attempt.

Mind you, I am Latino. I have NOTHING against guitars in the Mass. I am speaking of the attempt to merge &quot;with-it&quot; and Mass. I am not speaking about instruments in the Mass.

Emergent, by definition, is a challenge to current structural ways of relating. There is a desire to replace current structures by alternate structures (open source vs hierarchical). So, would this be something like Bill Gates putting a Linux interface on top of Windows?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fear that an Emergent-style event in a mainline church would be like an old Greek mask over the reality. To go back to another generation, guitar Masses in the 1960&#8217;s were all too often that same type of attempt.</p>
<p>Mind you, I am Latino. I have NOTHING against guitars in the Mass. I am speaking of the attempt to merge &#8220;with-it&#8221; and Mass. I am not speaking about instruments in the Mass.</p>
<p>Emergent, by definition, is a challenge to current structural ways of relating. There is a desire to replace current structures by alternate structures (open source vs hierarchical). So, would this be something like Bill Gates putting a Linux interface on top of Windows?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huw</title>
		<link>http://raphael.doxos.com/2008/03/11/the-new-christians/comment-page-1/#comment-2350</link>
		<dc:creator>Huw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raphael.doxos.com/2008/03/11/the-new-christians/#comment-2350</guid>
		<description>You make my point very well:  I *love* the experimental liturgy of a certain place in SF.  I *equally* love the emergent folks... but I don&#039;t think they would go well together.  Now, my ideas about how to mix the &quot;Didache&quot; liturgy in an emergent context are, I think, valid.  But  There&#039;s really no way to pull a BCP Rt 2 Emergent... 

I think the result is the horridly &quot;with it&quot; experience called the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U2charist&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;U2charist&lt;/a&gt; which is even being pushed by some &quot;Anglimergent&quot; folks.  One rolls ones eyes, realising that  U2 is for GenX (40 somethings) the same as the Beetles were for Boomers - and no, I don&#039;t know anyone under the age of 30 who even listens to the stuff (forgive my anecdotal evidence).

Correction: Not Beetles.  GODSPELL!
&lt;strong&gt;Second Update&lt;/strong&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://anglimergent.ning.com/profiles/blog/show?id=1972049%3ABlogPost%3A11327&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;look at this discussion between Anglicans...&lt;/a&gt; which kinda validates all the things we&#039;ve hit on.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make my point very well:  I *love* the experimental liturgy of a certain place in SF.  I *equally* love the emergent folks&#8230; but I don&#8217;t think they would go well together.  Now, my ideas about how to mix the &#8220;Didache&#8221; liturgy in an emergent context are, I think, valid.  But  There&#8217;s really no way to pull a BCP Rt 2 Emergent&#8230; </p>
<p>I think the result is the horridly &#8220;with it&#8221; experience called the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U2charist" rel="nofollow">U2charist</a> which is even being pushed by some &#8220;Anglimergent&#8221; folks.  One rolls ones eyes, realising that  U2 is for GenX (40 somethings) the same as the Beetles were for Boomers &#8211; and no, I don&#8217;t know anyone under the age of 30 who even listens to the stuff (forgive my anecdotal evidence).</p>
<p>Correction: Not Beetles.  GODSPELL!<br />
<strong>Second Update</strong>  <a href="http://anglimergent.ning.com/profiles/blog/show?id=1972049%3ABlogPost%3A11327" rel="nofollow">look at this discussion between Anglicans&#8230;</a> which kinda validates all the things we&#8217;ve hit on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
