<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inconvenient Truths</title>
	<atom:link href="http://raphael.doxos.com/2008/05/20/inconvenient-truths/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://raphael.doxos.com/2008/05/20/inconvenient-truths/</link>
	<description>Some place between 40 and Death</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fr. Ernesto</title>
		<link>http://raphael.doxos.com/2008/05/20/inconvenient-truths/#comment-3447</link>
		<dc:creator>Fr. Ernesto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 18:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raphael.doxos.com/?p=2646#comment-3447</guid>
		<description>I think that what is becoming clear is that the path to "green" is no longer simple.

Do we put up wind farms? Then be prepared to put up with dead birds chopped into pieces by the blades.

Do we go for bio-fuels? Then be prepared for starving peoples.

I could go on, but those two choices mentioned brings out the point that one person's green may be another person's evil. Unfortunately, much of the green movement is not accustomed to compromises. Yet, now that there is more political strength in "green" thinking, those little non-cooperating groups are having to ask themselves how to put policies together in a way that is effective. Questions like what is the lesser of several evils will have to enter the green lexicon, every bit as much as it already has to the non-green lexicon.

In other words, welcome to the real world of difficult choices, oh greens!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that what is becoming clear is that the path to &#8220;green&#8221; is no longer simple.</p>
<p>Do we put up wind farms? Then be prepared to put up with dead birds chopped into pieces by the blades.</p>
<p>Do we go for bio-fuels? Then be prepared for starving peoples.</p>
<p>I could go on, but those two choices mentioned brings out the point that one person&#8217;s green may be another person&#8217;s evil. Unfortunately, much of the green movement is not accustomed to compromises. Yet, now that there is more political strength in &#8220;green&#8221; thinking, those little non-cooperating groups are having to ask themselves how to put policies together in a way that is effective. Questions like what is the lesser of several evils will have to enter the green lexicon, every bit as much as it already has to the non-green lexicon.</p>
<p>In other words, welcome to the real world of difficult choices, oh greens!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
