Comments on: Reminder to my CA readers http://raphael.doxos.com/2008/06/17/reminder-to-my-ca-readers/ We are Flesh-and-Spirit on a journey to Integral Unity with God. Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:03:43 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5 By: Huw http://raphael.doxos.com/2008/06/17/reminder-to-my-ca-readers/#comment-4696 Huw Wed, 18 Jun 2008 01:29:25 +0000 http://raphael.doxos.com/?p=2750#comment-4696 In a sense, LOL. It's more a populist state: the law was written thus at a time when ministers were few and far between. It became important for marriages to happen - without the yoke of church interference in state matters (ie, a legal contract). The current move of the court returns California to its non-priest-ridden roots. In a sense, LOL. It’s more a populist state: the law was written thus at a time when ministers were few and far between. It became important for marriages to happen - without the yoke of church interference in state matters (ie, a legal contract).

The current move of the court returns California to its non-priest-ridden roots.

]]> By: An-Sionnach http://raphael.doxos.com/2008/06/17/reminder-to-my-ca-readers/#comment-4672 An-Sionnach Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:20:59 +0000 http://raphael.doxos.com/?p=2750#comment-4672 Actually this is a pretty Islamic standard, particularly since we have no ministers per se, just the Iman. Who can be anyone, and is decided up by the community. It's the contract between the two people that make the marriage valid. So does that make California a Islamic State? =P Actually this is a pretty Islamic standard, particularly since we have no ministers per se, just the Iman. Who can be anyone, and is decided up by the community. It’s the contract between the two people that make the marriage valid. So does that make California a Islamic State? =P

]]>