<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Excursus: Eucharistic Sacrifice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://raphael.doxos.com/2008/06/29/excursus-eucharistic-sacrifice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://raphael.doxos.com/2008/06/29/excursus-eucharistic-sacrifice/</link>
	<description>We are Flesh-and-Spirit on a journey to Integral Unity with God.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Huw</title>
		<link>http://raphael.doxos.com/2008/06/29/excursus-eucharistic-sacrifice/#comment-5671</link>
		<dc:creator>Huw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 21:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raphael.doxos.com/?p=2802#comment-5671</guid>
		<description>You've  misread Rick's words.  He said that "Alcuin and others "restored"' he put it in quotes on purpose and then added, "in fact introduced".

I welcome your citation of other historical issues - although please make sure you've got Rick's words right before you react.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve  misread Rick&#8217;s words.  He said that &#8220;Alcuin and others &#8220;restored&#8221;&#8216; he put it in quotes on purpose and then added, &#8220;in fact introduced&#8221;.</p>
<p>I welcome your citation of other historical issues - although please make sure you&#8217;ve got Rick&#8217;s words right before you react.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fr. Ernesto</title>
		<link>http://raphael.doxos.com/2008/06/29/excursus-eucharistic-sacrifice/#comment-5670</link>
		<dc:creator>Fr. Ernesto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 20:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raphael.doxos.com/?p=2802#comment-5670</guid>
		<description>Alcuin "reintroduced" unleavened bread????? Odd, I just checked my Council of Trullo from 692 where it legislates that no priest or layman may use the "unleavened bread of the Jews." It was well known by that Council's date that both the Romans and the Armenians used unleavened bread, as a rule. This is part of the reason why both Romans and Armenians refused to accept Trullo.

Patriarchs of Constantinople tried to use azymes against Rome and Armenia. Sadly, they ended up with a divided Church which had neither Rome nor Armenia.

Having said that, the author you are quoting needs to redo his historical research, on that and on several other points in this particular article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alcuin &#8220;reintroduced&#8221; unleavened bread????? Odd, I just checked my Council of Trullo from 692 where it legislates that no priest or layman may use the &#8220;unleavened bread of the Jews.&#8221; It was well known by that Council&#8217;s date that both the Romans and the Armenians used unleavened bread, as a rule. This is part of the reason why both Romans and Armenians refused to accept Trullo.</p>
<p>Patriarchs of Constantinople tried to use azymes against Rome and Armenia. Sadly, they ended up with a divided Church which had neither Rome nor Armenia.</p>
<p>Having said that, the author you are quoting needs to redo his historical research, on that and on several other points in this particular article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
