Thirty Pieces of Silver
HE NEW MILLENNIUM Brought me to several surprising changes all at once. My job at the California Institute of Integral Studies allowed me to take classes at a discounted rate so I used my benefit to finish my BA. The BA Completion Programme at CIIS spent a good deal of time discussing why it was that I’d not finished in the first place. I’ve compared this to group therapy: 15 people sitting in a circle, twice a month, discussing things that needed to change in order to let one finish. What changes in life had happened since one failed to finish? What was new now that caused one to want to finish were, before, one only wanted to run away?
At the same time, I was wrestling with the vocational discernment team at St Gregory of Nyssa Parish. Was I called to the priesthood? I’ve also compared this to group therapy: once or twice a month, 15 people sitting in a circle, discussing things that need to change in order to let one finish. Except where CIIS was group therapy, the Discernment Team felt like working with 15 therapists.
These two therapeutic processes played out in a complex way on my own internal dialogue which was, at the time, covering a number of mid-life issues. (I was 36 in 2000.) It felt like my life was looping itself (like it does today, to be honest). Somehow I had been dealing with the same set of questions since moving to SF in 1997 and it was all coming to a head. What was a relationship? What was GOd? What was I doing in Church? What was I doing in bars? What was I doing in bed? What was I doing at the altar? What was love? Why did men constantly treat me like a cute, huggable (but not dateable/marriageable) Teddy Bear? Why was I about as rootless as I could be?
The month I first moved to SF, I met a man in a bar. For the next 5 years we flirted off and on as he moved to Sacramento and then Seattle. Then we forgot about each other. We met, again, in December of 2002 – just as I was planning to move to Asheville, NC. Things continued to evolve and soon my own desire to leave SF was struggling with my desire to stay with RJ. My issues with theology and sex were coming up more and more and it was harder to deal with any of them.
While becoming Orthodox was, I still believe, the right thing, nearly all the rest of the decisions made in those succeeding months were based on my own unwillingness to communicate in-person with anyone. Writing was about the only method I had, but my blog had no audience – certainly not the people to whom I needed to talk.
Follow this: I needed to have several serious conversations over the course of two years, with my discernment team, my college classes, my partner, my confessor. But I was afraid to talk to them. So I used my website, my blog to vent. For example: for a while I had a “book blog” where I posted as-it-happened reactions to the books we were reading in class. These were filled with all the usual liberal arguments, all the usual clap trap about peace with no Jesus, love with no sin and sin with no guilt, so I vented a lot. At the same time my reaction to things in my parish community were much the same. But ididnt tell anyone. I was afraid they wouldn’t let me be a priest. But after converting to Orthodoxy – in a parish with several gay couples – I was, myself, continuing to struggle with the difference between things as they were and “things as they should be” in my head. Dating a man – then living with a man in my own apartment on Minna Street, wanting to leave, wanting to stay, wanting to have to stop wanting. I kept writing about the people I should be talking to… And got an audience of people that were also venting about the same people.
A curious transubstantiation took place.
The more I said the things my audience wanted to hear the more applause I got. The more applause I got the more I wanted to say those things. And wanting to say those things is the same as believing them. Life soon follows wanting. My own sense of self was changing. I wasn’t a conservative but I played on on the Internet.
This is the mindset (in hindsight) of the person who wrote “I was in Hell” whilst living in a passive agressive argument with his soon to be ex-lover in SF. (Please read all the follow-up posts and comments over there.) I earned $200 for this piece of writing, the only piece of my prose ever to get published-for-pay.
It’s interesting to note: “I was in Hell” blames everyone else for the choices and struggles I was making. That’s not very Orthodox. Not at all. But Frederica Matthewes Green called it one of the best examples of Orthodox Spiritual Writing she’d ever seen. Get that? It’s all your fault… But when I later discovered that it was my fault that I’m a self-centered ass… and that you are Christ, even if you’re dancing naked in a gay pride parade… she said my metaphor was weak. No one liked this article as much. Not at all.
So there I learned, right there. My crowd didn’t want to pay for me to be a sinner. They just wanted to pay for me to blame everyone else because it supported not their religion but rather their politics.
And, ironically, that was the beginning of my coming out.
My conversion was real. I’m still wrestling with that. But my conservatism was not. The slow, dawning realization that Red Staters had hijacked my Chrismation Process for their own purposes was a bit painful. What was real, what was not? What was chrismation? What was conversion? What was important? Questions are more important than answers, I think. I’ve been blogging my way through that since 2005.








“My conversion was real. I’m still wrestling with that. But my conservatism was not.”
I feel the same way about my experience with Orthodoxy. I still find many things compelling – the Christ-centeredness, the ascetisism, the mystical, apophatic theology, the liturgy, the sense of community that I felt at a place like All Saints, Chicago – but I’m not conservative, or at least not in the way that most conservatives are these days. Most of the Orthodox converts I met were conservative in the sense that they were looking for absolute certainty and a tradition (and a priest) who would deliver them this commodity. My attraction to Orthodoxy was a little different. I admired the tension between an apophatic approach to theology within the stability of a 2000 year tradition. Most of my co-religionists at the time didn’t want to have anything to do with tension. This was why they became Orthodox – to escape from tension. For this reason, I realized my true home was in the Episcopal Church, even if this tension remains for the rest of my life.
It’s been fun reading your posts, Huw. I hope you get much rest and a sense of vitality and peace from your sabbatical.
Huw and James, I am still convinced that Orthodoxy is the right destination. But, I am not a politically conservative Christian. James, it may help you to know that our Metropolitan (Antiochian) and many Arab Orthodox priests are horrified at the politically conservative opinions of many of the convert clergy. So am I.
I have said before and will say again that the issue is one of Truth regardless of the blemishes of the Church. Reality is that the Church is blemished. But, the question is which Church speaks Truth to us. It is an issue that everyone needs to resolve.
If one believes that no Church has the Truth, then it does not matter whether one is Christian, Buddhist, or Pagan. Otherwise one has to make some choices.
Huw, I regret that you are not near where my mission is. GRIN. I suspect we might make an interesting team, with lots and lots of arguments, but maybe even lots of life in the parish.
“But, the question is which Church speaks Truth to us. It is an issue that everyone needs to resolve.”
What do you mean by “truth”? A set of propositions about how God/the universe works? The person of Christ? Moral do’s and dont’s?
I take a more agnostic approach to this question. Simply put, I don’t know, yet I’m still drawn to a sacramental/liturgical understanding of the Christian faith and I know that doing this in a community setting is far better than doing it on my own. I also know that I should love the Lord my God with all my heart, mind and soul and to love my neighbor as myself. How this plays out in my life, I’m figuring that out on a day to day basis within the context of community.
In my area, staying in the Orthodox Church was a matter of either staying with the converts or joining an ethnic parish. Neither of these work for me. I”ve long since given up the certainties of my evangelical childhood and I don’t believe that abortion and gay marriage are THE moral issues of our time. I’m also not Greek/Arab/Russian/Serb. Despite its many faults, the Anglican tradition seems to be the best home for me now.
I also regret that I’m not near your mission, though. It seems like the place where apophatic/mystical theology and the stability of tradition intersect.
I’m with James here… there is this curious dichotomy: “speaks Truth” is one concept. “Jesus is THE Truth” is another concept. I think it is entirely possible to accept the the latter premise whilst still holding to the claim that no one church has “the truth”. In fact, this is where I waffle.
Father Victor (Memory Eternal!) said to me once that if I have become convinced that the Orthodox Church is THE church then I should join her. I’m quite willing to say it is so… but I’m not convinced of it. If Church is The Body of Christ and Christ is The Truth… then it follows Church is too. But if Orthodoxy is The Church (read ONLY Church) – and she teaches that “Church” means “Visible Church”, the Institution – then we’ve got a lot of problems to reconcile long before I can be “convinced”.
I can easily see that she holds the most ancient doctrines – provided we don’t mean anything older than the 3rd or 4th century. But the *most* ancient doctrines, those in Acts (avoiding blood…) and the Didache (Jesus, your servant) are no where held outside of some nearly-Arian Messianic Synagogues. And we know the latter have not been around for more than 25 years or so.
I don’t need to taunt you with logic or history, you know where I’m coming from.
On the other hand, I have also learned that one one parish thinks of as radically central to Orthodoxy the next one thinks of as adiaphora. It seems (as I’ve often said – and other well before me and in better ways) the only truly central doctrine of Orthodoxy is being there.
That makes biblical sense: gather 2 or 3 in Jesus Name to Be There… the rest is just colour commentary.
The only thing that matters is Love. Doctrine is Easy. It takes HARD WORK (salvific work) to Love.