<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sarx &#187; Teh Gay</title>
	<atom:link href="http://raphael.doxos.com/category/teh-gay/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://raphael.doxos.com</link>
	<description>We are Flesh-and-Spirit on a journey to Integral Unity with God.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 13:26:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Russian Patriarch Opposes Gay Discrimination&#8230; but.</title>
		<link>http://raphael.doxos.com/2009/12/24/russian-patriarch-opposes-gay-discrimination-but/</link>
		<comments>http://raphael.doxos.com/2009/12/24/russian-patriarch-opposes-gay-discrimination-but/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 11:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Huw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Teh Gay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[church geekery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orthodoxy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[russia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raphael.doxos.com/?p=6140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HIS CAME Across the AP yesterday, pointed out to me by a friend on Twitter. Russian Orthodox Church embraces gays. &#8220;IS OUTRAGE!&#8221; says Fr Vasili, I&#8217;m sure: not lamenting the sudden embrace, but rather the misleading headline. Be sure to read the AP story: essentially gay is still bad, but we oppose persecution of gays. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.doxos.com/image/alphabet/t.jpg" alt="T" height="40" width="40" class="unicil" title="Holy Saint Tikhon Pray to God for Us!" align="left" clear="all">HIS CAME Across the AP yesterday, pointed out to me by a <a href="http://www.frpeterpreble.com/">friend on Twitter</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jhcRjyymhm_fzqzblWdA9Cnj8qOgD9CP0JP80">Russian Orthodox Church embraces gays</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;IS OUTRAGE!&#8221; says Fr Vasili, I&#8217;m sure: not lamenting the sudden embrace, but rather the misleading headline.  Be sure to read the AP story: essentially gay is still bad, but we oppose persecution of gays.  This is a huge step in the right direction for a church that was totally silent whilst people with icons in Moscow spat on and kicked gay people in the streets a couple of years ago.  This is a huge step in a world-wide denomination that has been totally silent in Uganda where the local hierarchy is either being misrepresented in the press or else supporting the anti0gay law that even forbids <em>counselling</em> gay people in Church.</p>
<p>But the Russian statement &#8211; still a huge step &#8211; isn&#8217;t all that: the UK&#8217;s &#8220;Pink News&#8221; provides a bit of historical context that puts the lie to His Holiness&#8217; statement that &#8220;we have repeatedly spoken out against discriminating people for their nontraditional sexual orientation&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2009/12/23/head-of-russian-orthodox-church-condemns-discrimination-against-gays/">Head of Russian Orthodox Church condemns discrimination against gays</a>.</p>
<p>But it is the interfax article from Russia that presents the fullest version of the Patriarch&#8217;s recent statement on the topic. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.interfax-religion.com/?act=news&#038;div=6769">Patriarch Kirill believes same sex relationship sinful, but speaks against antigay repressions</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>“We accept any choice a persons makes, including in the field of sexual orientation. It’s a personal choice. However, it doesn’t change our position on the phenomenon,” the Patriarch said at his meeting with General Secretary of the Council of Europe in the Cathedral of Christ the Savior in Moscow. </p>
<p>Patriarch Kirill reminded, “religious traditions of all nations confirm that homosexuality is a sin as well moral disorientation of a person.” </p>
<p>However, a person with homosexual inclinations “shouldn’t be punished, that’s why we’ve always spoken against any repressions and discrimination of people with different sexual orientation.”</p>
<p>“Considering homosexuality a sin, we are categorically against equaling homosexual relations to natural,” the Patriarch further said.</p></blockquote>
<p>Hedging His Holiness&#8217; bets a lot there&#8230; but &#8220;Shouldn&#8217;t be punished&#8221; is pretty clear, Uganda.  Of course the Ugandan church is not a Russian plant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://raphael.doxos.com/2009/12/24/russian-patriarch-opposes-gay-discrimination-but/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yhteys-liike</title>
		<link>http://raphael.doxos.com/2009/12/20/yhteys-liike/</link>
		<comments>http://raphael.doxos.com/2009/12/20/yhteys-liike/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 13:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Huw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Teh Gay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[church geekery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orthoparadoxy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finnish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orthodox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[russian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suomen tasavalta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suomi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raphael.doxos.com/?p=6127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HE MOVEMENT &#8220;Community&#8221; is a Finnish ecumenical organisation that seeks to include members of sexual minorities (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgendered, Queer, etc) in the full life of the Church. I found out about them reading a report against them from a conservative group within the Finnish Orthodox Church, the Brotherhood of St Kosmas of Aitolia. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.doxos.com/image/alphabet/t.jpg" alt="T" height="40" width="40" class="unicil" title="Holy Saint Tikhon Pray to God for Us!" align="left" clear="all">HE MOVEMENT &#8220;Community&#8221; is a Finnish ecumenical organisation that seeks to include members of sexual minorities (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgendered, Queer, etc) in the full life of the Church.  I found out about them reading a report <em>against</em> them from a conservative group within the Finnish Orthodox Church, the Brotherhood of St Kosmas of Aitolia.  That report is <a href="http://www.kosmas.fi/PDF-files-veljeston%20paasivu/Finn_Ort_Probl_2009_Autumn.pdf">here</a> (largish PDF file). </p>
<p><a href="http://yhteys.org/">Here is the website of the movement, Community</a>. They also have a <a href="http://www.facebook.com/group.php?v=wall&#038;ref=search&#038;gid=15988450257">Facebook group</a>.</p>
<p>All these resources are in Finnish (note to self, <a href="http://www.finnishschool.com/">time to learn Suomi</a>?) but the Brotherhood of St Kosmas has unwittingly done a pro-gay favour in translating many documents into English.  Perhaps they wish to enlist (like the Anglicans in Africa) the help of conservative Americans and the IRD.  </p>
<p>As I noted earlier &#8211; the Brotherhood, like Orthodox COnservatives in England &#8211; seems actually to be some kind of Pro-Kremlin (and/or Proto-Tsarist) political movement, siding with Russia against &#8220;the west&#8221;.  The theo-fascists in the IRD should both love and hate that&#8230;</p>
<p>The Brotherhood provided two very good English documents for us:</p>
<p>The Community Declaration and a side statement from Orthodox members of same organisation. Both are included below&#8230;</p>
<p><span id="more-6127"></span>The Declaration from Yhteys-liike</p>
<blockquote><p>COMMUNITY is an open forum for all the members of Christian churches and communities, who believe that the gospel of Jesus Christ also embraces sexual and gender minorities, such as gays, lesbians and bisexuals, as well as trans-gender individuals as full-standing people and Christians. They have the right to participate as themselves in the life and management of Christian parishes.</p>
<p>WE ARE a group of Christians, individuals with a variety of backgrounds, who work to materialize the above-mentioned right in practice. We invite new members to look for ever-deepening concept on community and courage to work for our goal.</p>
<p>AS PEOPLE committed to Community, we are active members of our Christian churches and communities, both office-holders and lay people. In our work related to pastoral care, education and administration, as well as in the everyday life of Christian parishes, we have faced the often painful reality of the lives of people who belong to sexual and gender minorities.</p>
<p>WE CALL TO Community people in Christian churches and communities ready to serve as friends, pastoral caregivers and supporters of those who belong to sexual and gender minorities in various parts of our country.</p>
<p>WE ALSO LOOK for people, who want to promote the debate on the rights of those in sexual and gender minorities both in Christian churches and communities and society on the whole. We try to make sure that no-one will be left alone in his/her internal struggle or under pressure of public attacks and prejudices. Silence and lies are a destructive burden for all those involved. We want to create in our Christian communities an atmosphere, in which it is possible to be hones and to live according to one&#8217;s conscience, with no need to fear that one is rejected or insulted for it.</p>
<p>AS CHRISTIANS, WE are bound by responsibility, respect, confidence and reciprocal commitment in inter-personal relations, including sexuality. The Bible doesn&#8217;t contain any part, which would condemn a faithful marital relationship based on respect and commitment between people of the same sex. The parts in the Bible interpreted in this way are chiefly related to rejection of sexual abuse and irresponsibility. We know that the Bible is interpreted in light of various traditions and with a variety of emphases. At the same time, we have confidence that open debate and new research can help us to get out of old and biased interpretations based on a fear of deviation. Many questions are difficult and answers are still open. However, we have confidence that, in accordance to the promise given by Jesus, the Holy Spirit will guide us towards the truth.</p>
<p>COMMUNITY REQUIRES that the principles and practices, which constantly cause anxiety among the people who belong to sexual and gender minorities and function in Christian churches and communities, should be re-evaluated. Those complicate the lives of these people as Christians and may also restrict their participation in the sacraments of the church. Moreover, valuable work of many employees is lost.</p>
<p>IN CHRISTIAN FAITH, the most crucial thing is God&#8217;s mercy, granted in Jesus Christ. This gospel of forgiveness and conciliation calls from isolation into community and from alienation into mutual confidence between Christians with different sexual orientations. The gospel provides the back-ground for reciprocal respect and cooperation both in office and the life of Christian communities in general.</p>
<p>At the moment, we are especially concerned about the fact that employees, elected officials and other people bearing a responsibility in the parishes, who belong to sexual and gender minorities often cannot but keep silent about their sexual orientation or resign from their work and even their entire Christian community.</p>
<p>Homosexual employees who live in stabilized and committed same-sex unions also give Christian churches and parishes an opportunity to provide positive examples for their members, who belong to sexual minorities. This would strengthen the right of everyone to have sacraments, pastoral care and Christian unity.</p></blockquote>
<p>Subsequent Statement from Orthodox members of the movement, &#8220;Community&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p>We, the undersigned members of the Orthodox Church are involved in the movement Community, because we believe that it promotes the ethical teaching of gospel. Christ accepted all kinds of people in his company. He set as examples people, who were despised, rejected and held in contempt. The Kingdom of God calls for integrity and penance. Integrity is a fruit of love, which teaches us to respect all people. Christ forbids us to condemn each other.</p>
<p>Sexuality doesn&#8217;t determine the whole of a person. Homosexuality is an innate tendency, not a choice. We hope that the Orthodox who belong to sexual minorities will find their spiritual home in their own parish and that they will be able to participate in the divine services, prayers and sacraments of the church in full.</p>
<p>The teaching of the church about sexuality, family and the equality of man and woman meets various challenges, in which homosexuality is only one. In our opinion, homosexuality is, above all, a pastoral question, not a dogmatic one. We work for the values of the movement Community within the framework of the sacred tradition and canonical tradition of our church. We are not bringing new practices into the life of the church, nor are we draw parallels between matrimony and same-sex unions.</p>
<p>On the basis of the Orthodox view on people, we consider that all kinds of discrimination are a sin. We hope that an open and objective discussion on issues related to sexuality will promote tolerance and love for one&#8217;s neighbour in our church.</p></blockquote>
<p>Copyright Information:</p>
<p>This text is free to be distributed in any form, unless commercially sold. Publisher&#8217;s name <em>Pyh&auml;n Kosmas Aitolialaisen Veljest&ouml;</em>, or any of its translations (for example &#8220;The Brotherhood of Saint Kosmas of Aitolia&#8221;), or the publisher&#8217;s official main internet site address <a href="http://www.kosmas.fi">http://www.kosmas.fi</a> should be mentioned, when using parts which are not directly and obviously taken from other, primary sources. Also, the Publisher&#8217;s name of the compilation should be mentioned if using citations of this compilation that are translated from Finnish to English. All other rights are reserved by the Publisher, unless permitted in writing by authorized representatives of <em>Pyh&auml;n Kosmas Aitolialaisen Veljest&ouml; ry</em>, Joensuu, Finland.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://raphael.doxos.com/2009/12/20/yhteys-liike/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Religious Right FAILS</title>
		<link>http://raphael.doxos.com/2009/12/13/religious-right-fails/</link>
		<comments>http://raphael.doxos.com/2009/12/13/religious-right-fails/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 03:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Huw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Teh Gay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[houston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[queers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raphael.doxos.com/?p=6112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Agonizing (yet Most Entertaining) Death Throes of America&#8217;s Bourgeois Christian Cults: Glory to God for All things. &#8220;&#8216;But the religious right failed. &#8220; I don&#8217;t know a thing about the new Mayor&#8217;s politics. I tend to imagine she is at least as conservative as the usual dixiecrats ie: a full-on Republican in all but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://syntheopoiesis.blogspot.com/2009/12/encyclical-on-end-times-2-agonizing-yet.html">The Agonizing (yet Most Entertaining) Death Throes of America&#8217;s Bourgeois Christian Cults</a>: Glory to God for All things.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;&#8216;But the religious right failed. &#8220;</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t know a thing about the new Mayor&#8217;s politics.  I tend to imagine she is at least as conservative as the usual dixiecrats ie: a full-on Republican in all but name.  I may be wrong there &#8211; this story was not even on my radar. But, lo: if Houston, Texas, can withstand a smear campaign from the religious right and elect a partnered Lesbian as mayor, things can&#8217;t be all bad.</p>
<p>To be clear: I&#8217;m not saying I would have voted for her because she was gay.  But I&#8217;m damn happy to see the defeat of those who didn&#8217;t vote for her for the same reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://raphael.doxos.com/2009/12/13/religious-right-fails/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ARGH updates&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://raphael.doxos.com/2009/12/10/argh-updates/</link>
		<comments>http://raphael.doxos.com/2009/12/10/argh-updates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 02:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Huw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Teh Gay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orthoparadoxy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anglicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orthodoxy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[praxis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rick warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uganda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raphael.doxos.com/?p=6102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[EEN A GOOD Day since my earlier post: UPDATE (1): Fr Peter responds in grace and love and keeping to the traditional teachings of his church. Amen! Update (2) Rick Warren does the right thing UPDATE (3) Rod&#8217;s on board. Update (4) The Vatican Chimes in today as well. They all hedge their bets but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.doxos.com/image/alphabet/b.jpg" alt="B" height="40" width="40" class="unicil" title="Holy Saint Benedict Pray to God for Us!" align="left" clear="all">EEN A GOOD Day since my <a href="http://raphael.doxos.com/2009/12/10/argh-4/" target="_blank">earlier post</a>:</p>
<p><b>UPDATE (1)</b>: Fr Peter responds in <a HREF="http://www.frpeterpreble.com/2009/12/first-they-came.html" target="_blank">grace and love</a> and keeping to the traditional teachings of his church. Amen!</p>
<p><b>Update (2)</b> Rick Warren <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/12/10/rick-warren-does-the.html?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+boingboing%2FiBag+%28Boing+Boing%29&#038;utm_content=Twitter" target="_blank">does the right thing</a></p>
<p><b>UPDATE (3)</b> <a href="http://blog.beliefnet.com/crunchycon/2009/12/ugandas-insane-proposed-anti-g.html" target="_blank">Rod&#8217;s on board.</a></p>
<p><b>Update (4)</b> <a href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/12/10/17738" target="_blank">The Vatican Chimes in today as well</a>.  </p>
<p>They all hedge their bets but that&#8217;s ok: I didn&#8217;t expect *anyone* to say &#8220;Gay is Good&#8221;.  I just don&#8217;t want gays dead&#8230; and I don&#8217;t want to feel that giving my money to the local Greek church or Agnlican congregation (or Rick Warren book purchase) will, ultimately, support the holocaust against gays in Africa.</p>
<p>With brothers and sisters like this, I feel safe in God&#8217;s house &#8211; even if we disagree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://raphael.doxos.com/2009/12/10/argh-updates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ARGH.</title>
		<link>http://raphael.doxos.com/2009/12/10/argh-4/</link>
		<comments>http://raphael.doxos.com/2009/12/10/argh-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Huw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Teh Gay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orthoparadoxy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anglicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orthodoxy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[praxis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rick warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uganda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raphael.doxos.com/?p=6092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HINGS THAT MAKE You want to be an atheist&#8230; 1) I do, really, believe there is a right way to do CHristianity and a wrong way to do it. 2) I do, really, believe that this right and wrong has little to do with &#8220;doctrine&#8221; per se (iota sized technicalities about begetting and essence and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.doxos.com/image/alphabet/t.jpg" alt="T" height="40" width="40" class="unicil" title="Holy Saint Tikohn Pray to God for Us!" align="left" clear="all">HINGS THAT MAKE You want to be an atheist&#8230;</p>
<p>1) I do, really, believe there is a right way to do CHristianity and a wrong way to do it.</p>
<p>2) I do, really, believe that this right and wrong has little to do with &#8220;doctrine&#8221; per se (iota sized technicalities about begetting and essence and accident and que) and much to do with practice (do justice, love mercy, pray for enemies, forgive, etc).</p>
<p>3) I do, really, believe that Christianity is judgmental in the first-person only.  I am the only sinner I&#8217;ll ever know, all others are to be Christ to me.</p>
<p>4) I do, really, believe that Christianity is communal.  None of the above is possible without a community: iron sharpens iron, rocks tumble in the river, sharpened edges grind down and we are saved together or not at all.</p>
<p>5) I do, really, believe that &#8220;saved&#8221; has to do with all of the above.  &#8220;Heaven&#8221; or &#8220;Afterlife&#8221; or &#8220;Pie in the Sky&#8221; is unimportant in this equation: if you think there is a &#8220;Heaven&#8221; why not make that lifestyle present here, now, always. If it&#8217;s around in the sky, that&#8217;s just a cool bonus.</p>
<p>6) I do, really, believe that right worship is found in a community that is &#8220;doing it right&#8221; and &#8211; at the same time &#8211; Traditional, &#8220;high church&#8221;, etc.  Montesorri Grade School silliness is not church, not worship: it is me-oriented, not God-oriented.  It <em>prevents</em> &#8220;Doing it right&#8221; because being me-oriented in worship results in being me-oriented in the world.  Being God-oriented in worship results in being God-oriented (ie, my neighbour) in the world.</p>
<p>Finally, because of Number 6, my experience is that numbers one through five <em>need</em> the traditional God-doctrines of Christianity to work.  Trinity, Church and Eucharist are the only ways this unity-in-diversity works at all.  THerefore,</p>
<p>7) I do, really, believe that persons who (without the above in mind) can be called doctrinally devout Christians have come to differing conclusions on the issue of human sexuality. My experience has been that persons who agree Trinity, Church and Eucharist can (<em>with</em> the above in mind) actually worship together in peace.  </p>
<p>I do, really, believe that&#8217;s the Kingdom of God on earth, taking over the world, destroying the systems of evil that man puts up and replacing it with Love.</p>
<p>Having said all that&#8230; news that the <a href="http://syntheopoiesis.blogspot.com/2009/12/state-ratified-gay-genocide-bill-to-be.html">State-Ratified Gay Genocide Bill to Be Enforced in Orthodox Churches, Warns Archbishop Jonah of Kampala and All Uganda (Catholic and Anglican Leaders Threaten Likewise)</a> coupled with the near total silence of global religious leaders (Canterbury, the Pope, Constantinople, Russia, and almost all American preachers and Denominational leaders across the spectrum) makes me wonder why the hell Jesus ever bothered to care about us at all and makes me wonder why the hell I should bother because it is clear that the man failed.</p>
<p>If this doesn&#8217;t make you <em>know</em> the Church is not infallible, nothing will.  (And those of you who want to quibble about doctrine can go stuff it.  Siding with the state &#8211; or anyone &#8211; in hate and genocide is not time for playing that &#8220;when she&#8217;s wrong, she&#8217;s not the Church&#8221; shell game.)</p>
<p>ECUSA elected a Gay Bishop last weekend, btw, and all those who are silent about hate launched into some SERIOUS hate very quickly about that&#8230;</p>
<p><b>UPDATE</b>: Fr Peter responds in <a HREF="http://www.frpeterpreble.com/2009/12/first-they-came.html" target="_blank">grace and love</a> and keeping to the traditional teachings of his church. Amen!</p>
<p><b>Update (2)</b> Rick Warren <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/12/10/rick-warren-does-the.html?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+boingboing%2FiBag+%28Boing+Boing%29&#038;utm_content=Twitter" target="_blank">does the right thing</a></p>
<p><b>UPDATE (3)</b> <a href="http://blog.beliefnet.com/crunchycon/2009/12/ugandas-insane-proposed-anti-g.html" target="_blank">Rod&#8217;s on board.</a></p>
<p><b>Update (4)</b> <a href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/12/10/17738" target="_blank">The Vatican Chimes in today as well</a>.  They hedge their bets but that&#8217;s ok: I didn&#8217;t expect *anyone* to say &#8220;Gay is Good&#8221;.  I just don&#8217;t want gays dead&#8230; and I don&#8217;t want to feel that giving my money to the local Greek church or Agnlican congregation (or Rick Warren book purchase) will, ultimately, support the holocaust against gays in Africa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://raphael.doxos.com/2009/12/10/argh-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Antigay Highway</title>
		<link>http://raphael.doxos.com/2009/11/19/the-antigay-highway/</link>
		<comments>http://raphael.doxos.com/2009/11/19/the-antigay-highway/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Huw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Teh Gay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teh internets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raphael.doxos.com/?p=6007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[F COURSE This shows up in my in-box just as I&#8217;m going to work. Here&#8217;s a link. Comments later. The Antigay Highway: New Report Details Mutually Beneficial Relationship Between US Evangelicals and African Antigay Clergy. &#8220;This report describes growing anti-gay movements in African churches as a ‘proxy war’ for US culture battles.&#8221;. I love being [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.doxos.com/image/alphabet/o.jpg" alt="O" height="40" width="40" class="unicil" title="Holy Saints Pray to God for Us!" align="left" clear="all">F COURSE This shows up in my in-box just as I&#8217;m going to work.  Here&#8217;s a link.  Comments later. <a href="http://www.religiondispatches.org/archive/religiousright/2046/the_antigay_highway:_new_report_details_mutually_beneficial_relationship_between_us_evangelicals_and_african_antigay_clergy_">The Antigay Highway: New Report Details Mutually Beneficial Relationship Between US Evangelicals and African Antigay Clergy</a>. <em>&#8220;This report describes growing anti-gay movements in African churches as a ‘proxy war’ for US culture battles.&#8221;</em>.  I love being a wedge issue. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://raphael.doxos.com/2009/11/19/the-antigay-highway/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Papist Plate, Pundity, Foil Fags for Maine Marriage</title>
		<link>http://raphael.doxos.com/2009/11/04/papist-plate-pundity-foil-fags-for-maine-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://raphael.doxos.com/2009/11/04/papist-plate-pundity-foil-fags-for-maine-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Huw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Teh Gay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raphael.doxos.com/?p=5943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HANKS, PINE Tree State, for once again proving that civil right should never &#8211; ever &#8211; be left up to a simple majority vote. The simple majority always wins. One wonders why Americans (and the rest of the world) are still so fascinated by democracy. Freedom, I can understand, liberty, equality, etc. But tyranny of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.doxos.com/image/alphabet/t.jpg" alt="T" height="40" width="40" class="unicil" title="Holy Saint TIkhon Pray to God for Us!" align="left" clear="all">HANKS, PINE Tree State, for once again proving that civil right should never &#8211; ever &#8211; be left up to a simple majority vote.  The simple majority always wins.</p>
<p>One wonders why Americans (and the rest of the world) are still so fascinated by democracy.  Freedom, I can understand, liberty, equality, etc.  But tyranny of the majority over the minority still fails to be self-evidently good.  The lesson learned here &#8211; like in California &#8211; is that depending on others to grant you a freedom is always stupid.  Group-think is, by its nature, conservative, slow, plodding.  It is not challenged, but rather comforted by messages of &#8220;keep things the same as they were&#8230;&#8221;  The primate mind (and humans are simply domesticated primates, remember) is threatened by change and difference.  What we see in Maine is simple evidence for human evolution: we are no further along than the apes.</p>
<p>Again, stop depending on others to give you rights.  No group in USonia has ever won any right at all by simple majority voting of others. Every right granted to non-male, non-white, non-heterosexual, non-free, non-adult persons in this country has been granted by court order or legislature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://raphael.doxos.com/2009/11/04/papist-plate-pundity-foil-fags-for-maine-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This is why hate crime laws are needed&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://raphael.doxos.com/2009/10/26/this-is-why-hate-crime-laws-are-needed/</link>
		<comments>http://raphael.doxos.com/2009/10/26/this-is-why-hate-crime-laws-are-needed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Huw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Teh Gay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raphael.doxos.com/?p=5904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pray for James Parkes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/merseyside/8326810.stm">Pray for James Parkes</a>.</center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://raphael.doxos.com/2009/10/26/this-is-why-hate-crime-laws-are-needed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>By their love&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://raphael.doxos.com/2009/10/23/by-their-love-2/</link>
		<comments>http://raphael.doxos.com/2009/10/23/by-their-love-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 05:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Huw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Teh Gay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rightwingers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolutionary throwbacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hate speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regressives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raphael.doxos.com/?p=5893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OT TO LAUGH At the so-called &#8220;Christians&#8221; out there&#8230; Senate passes hate crimes bill that would extend protection to gays, lesbians&#8230; and the right-wingnuts say&#8230; &#8220;&#8216;Expanding hate crimes puts America in lock step with the stated agenda of homosexual activists who will turn next to the so-called Employment Non-Discrimination Act, followed by the repeal of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.doxos.com/image/alphabet/g.jpg" alt="G" height="40" width="40" class="unicil" title="Holy Saint Gabriel Pray to God for Us!" align="left" clear="all">OT TO LAUGH At the so-called &#8220;Christians&#8221; out there&#8230; <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/22/AR2009102204689.html">Senate passes hate crimes bill that would extend protection to gays, lesbians</a>&#8230; and the right-wingnuts say&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;&#8216;Expanding hate crimes puts America in lock step with the stated agenda of homosexual activists who will turn next to the so-called Employment Non-Discrimination Act, followed by the repeal of the ban on homosexuality in the military and then the Defense of Marriage Act,&#8217; the Family Research Council warned on its Web site.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Translation&#8230;.</p>
<p>HOLY CRAP!  Now we can&#8217;t lynch &#8216;em anymore.</p>
<p>Next we&#8217;ll have to give&#8217;em jobs and stop treating them like second class people!  </p>
<p>First the left makes it illegal to hate coloreds, and now it&#8217;s illegal to hate fags too.</p>
<p>Next they&#8217;ll make it illegal for us to hate Muslims and pagans!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s like they want us to love everyone!</p>
<p>Damn Commies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://raphael.doxos.com/2009/10/23/by-their-love-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Help, Help!  I&#8217;m Being Oppressed!</title>
		<link>http://raphael.doxos.com/2009/10/19/help-help-im-being-oppressed/</link>
		<comments>http://raphael.doxos.com/2009/10/19/help-help-im-being-oppressed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 02:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Huw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Teh Gay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orthoparadoxy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teh internets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orthodoxy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tradition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raphael.doxos.com/?p=5878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[T ONE TIME, As many readers know, I attempted to live out what I saw as Theological Orthodoxy within a &#8220;canonical&#8221; Orthodox Church. At the time this included traditional teachings on human sexuality: these are heteronomative assumptions of monogamy equated with divine revelations of morality &#8211; and to make that statement I do not need [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.doxos.com/image/alphabet/a.jpg" alt="A" height="40" width="40" class="unicil" title="Kyrie Eleison!" align="left" clear="all">T ONE TIME, As many readers know, I attempted to live out what I saw as Theological Orthodoxy within a &#8220;canonical&#8221; Orthodox Church.  At the time this included traditional teachings on human sexuality: these are heteronomative assumptions of monogamy equated with divine revelations of morality &#8211; and to make that statement I do not need to claim the teachings, themselves, are &#8220;homophobic&#8221; etc.  We&#8217;ll touch on that later, if you don&#8217;t mind.  I&#8217;ve a more important first point, though: having decided that &#8220;Canonical&#8221; Eastern Orthodoxy was the way to go, I freely chose to take the path offered by the church.</p>
<p><span id="more-5878"></span>During that time, I had a discussion on a blog&#8230; don&#8217;t remember where.  I know there was a lot of converts and college students.  Wherever you have the latter you&#8217;ll get a very wide spectrum.  There was a gay person there, a gay political activist student person who struck me as very young.  His beef with me was, having decided to live celebrate, I was &#8220;in the closet&#8221; and therefore the evil enemy &#8211; and oppressed at the same time.  I was to be pitied and feared all at once.  And no conversation with this person was possible without his pop-psychoanalysis of my &#8220;problems&#8221; being offered.</p>
<p>Those of you who were reading me at that time will find &#8220;in the closet&#8221; hard to believe: I was as &#8220;out&#8221; then as I am now.  But I&#8217;d chosen not to act on my sexual urges in a way that we&#8217;ll call &#8220;Genitally Active&#8221;.  Since running sexually amuck in the gay community was not the right answer for me, I opted to try finding a different way to express my sexual energy, instead.  Sublimation is the psychological term here.  I&#8217;d allow for &#8220;delayed gratification&#8221; as well, if you wanted to focus on &#8220;suffer now, be blessed in eternity&#8221;.  But that wasn&#8217;t my own goal.  Even today, in my relationship with Brodie, I can see the damage I did to myself in those &#8220;sexually run amuck&#8221; days.  I still say that turning off everything for five years or so was probably the healthiest choice I made.</p>
<p>The key point: it was my choice.  I chose to become Orthodox and, I was aware what the tradition expected of me.  Unlike many persons raised in American religion, I knew that the only options were not legalism vrs libertinism. But most Americans seemingly can only understand that duality.  Either you can do what you want when you want or you have to follow some rules. It&#8217;s not possible, in this mindset, to follow some-but-not-all rules and do some-but-not-all of what you want without causing damage either to yourself or the path you say you follow.  Perfectly non-religious persons unschooled in theology or history will tell you point blank, you can&#8217;t be gay and Christian.  They will also tell you you can&#8217;t be celibate and healthy.</p>
<p>Three weeks ago there was this interesting discussion on BoingBoing:  <a href="http://boingboing.net/2009/09/27/are-muslim-women-opp.html"><em>Are Muslim Women Oppressed? Ask One</em></a>.</p>
<p>As of this writing there are 380 comments.  The last one is <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/09/27/are-muslim-women-opp.html#comment-610557">as typical of the conversation</a> as any other one.  The comment writers are terrified of the idea that someone could decide to follow a rule that say &#8220;no&#8221;.  They&#8217;re ok with &#8220;spirituality&#8221; but any implication that there is something to do&#8230; something that goes against cultural values like nudity and sexuality&#8230; or the idea that these ideas might be passed on to children&#8230; just scares the living daylights out of &#8216;em all. Perfectly non-religious persons unschooled in theology or history will tell you point blank, you can&#8217;t be a woman and Muslim.  They will also tell you you can&#8217;t be veiled and healthy.</p>
<p>In a phone chat with a friend last night we touched on the same issue.  She is engaged in vocational discernment and her friends are telling her to do &#8220;What makes her happy&#8221; whilst she is insisting that her family obligations prevent her, at this time, from simply running away to engage in scholarly study.  Her friends are horrified that she would say &#8220;no, I have a duty to XYZ before I can do this other thing.&#8221;</p>
<p>I share that to indicate it&#8217;s not just the non-religious who don&#8217;t get it.  Pious and religious persons schooled in theology and history will tell you point blank, you can&#8217;t be dutiful and happy.  I&#8217;ve run into these folks amid the uberfrum, I&#8217;ll admit: they think it their duty to be unhappy.  Smiles and piety don&#8217;t mix for these folks, regardless of what Jesus said on that mountainside.  But I&#8217;ve also seen this attitude from the mezzo-frum and the under-frum as well as the only-frum on Christmas &#038; Easter crowds.  Something about our American mindset says you can only be one or the other&#8230; legalism or libertinism.  For what it&#8217;s worth I&#8217;ve found this in Canadians as well.</p>
<p>This was a discussion I had when I left ECUSA for orthodoxy: a river, without banks, doesn&#8217;t flow: it meanders into marshes and dies.  I was told, point blank, that such a marshy swampy river is still a river.  So, OK, I&#8217;ll revert to a metaphor I learned in paganism: you can&#8217;t boil water without a pot&#8230; and a lid helps as well.  We need to confine things to raise power.  How many people do you know who are scattered all over the spectrum and never seem to get anything done?  It&#8217;s the folks who don&#8217;t dissipate their energy that do things.  Focus.  Make a choice to withdraw from some areas so that other areas may prosper more fully.  No first-year business man can open seven businesses all at once.  College students who pick multiple majors and never settle on one choice fail.</p>
<p>This is the problem with anti-gay rants in the Church: not the teaching of traditional sexuality.  But rather those folks who act as if gay is the only sin left are the mirror image (in the sense of legalism vs libertinism) of those who are &#8220;gay affirming&#8221; with no questions asked.  The traditional teaching that marriage is a monastery, a laboratory for salvation can, in fact, be as true in a same-sex marriage as in any other relationship.  It needn&#8217;t be all drugs and circuit parties!  In fact, most same-sex unions I know are as boring, as sexual, as bickerful, as simple as most heterosexual unions.  What breaks down for people today is <em>that&#8217;s the way it&#8217;s supposed to be</em>. They go &#8220;looking for themselves&#8221; as if they could exist at all alone.  </p>
<p>Responsibility, self-limiting choices, delayed gratification, postponed joy&#8230; these are the stuff of maturity.</p>
<p>To flee them is simply immaturity raising its ugly head.  To flee them in the name of ego, self and &#8220;spirituality not religion&#8221; is sheer stupidity for it will mean the dissipation of self, ego and spirit.  Eventually, lack of responsibility and self-imposed limits will lead to death.</p>
<p>Escaping from the choice between legalism and libertinism is, ironically, the purpose of fasting seasons, the Wednesday/Friday fast, the abstinence from feasting and the return to feasting.  When you treat these things as &#8220;rules&#8221; you destroy them.  When you treat them as spiritual tools designed for your salvation&#8230;</p>
<p>My favourite Father Victor story gets told one more time.  Confused by the Advent Fasting calendar (fish some days, but not others, etc) I asked him what was up.  He showed me a calendar with different colours on different days.  And, flipping back and forth through the pages he said, &#8220;This is for monks&#8230; You&#8230;&#8221; (He knew that I was a writer) he said, &#8220;You, does reading the newspaper make you angry?&#8221;  Yes, Father.  &#8220;STOP READING THE NEWSPAPER!&#8221;  He yelled.  OK&#8230; &#8220;That is your Advent fast&#8221;. </p>
<p>If you take the fasts or other mysteries as legal requirements, (How often do you go to confession?) you&#8217;ll not find in them the grace you need.  They are tools, choices to make &#8211; self-limiting, healthy and joy-delaying choices &#8211; for your own salvation. Like the pruning of a rose, they lead to better, bigger, healthier blooms.  Like the banks of a river they lead to faster-flowing, cleaner water.  Like the sides and top of a pot, they hold the heat in and make for a rapid boil.</p>
<p>I left my time in &#8220;canonical&#8221; Orthodoxy, but I&#8217;ve not left behind the tools I learned.  And I pass them along to any child I meet.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not worried about &#8220;destroying their minds&#8221;.  THe culture has it&#8217;s preachers on every corner, on every television and radio and all over the internet.  This fear of teaching religion to children is a fear of the power of the secular message.  If one&#8217;s exposure to religion can destroy it despite all its &#8220;logic&#8221; and &#8220;scientific evidence&#8221; then is very weak indeed.  Truth is always more attractive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://raphael.doxos.com/2009/10/19/help-help-im-being-oppressed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
